Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
126.62
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
127.57
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0255075100125196119922024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 127.57 against 126.62 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0.95.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 24 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 13.74 8.46 5.28 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 22.61 11.61 11 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 30.74 15.03 15.7 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 53.95 19.75 34.2 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 69.44 45.12 24.31 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 99.58 98.03 1.55 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 126.47 123.62 2.85 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pineapples — gross production index number, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 127.57 against 126.62 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in pineapples — gross production index number between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.95, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for pineapples — gross production index number?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 24 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pineapples-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pineapples-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pineapples — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
116 places, 6,561 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.