Cuba vs Tonga: Phosphate application per hectare of cropland
Cuba
0.59
in 2023
Tonga
0.4
in 2023
Cuba rank
176th
Tonga rank
179th
Phosphate application per hectare of cropland over time
- Cuba
- Tonga
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.59 against 0.4 in Tonga, a difference of 0.19.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.5 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 176th and Tonga ranks 179th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 22.95 | 0.34 | 22.61 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 4.17 | 0.2888 | 3.88 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 5.54 | 1.85 | 3.69 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1.27 | 1.42 | 0.1475 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate application per hectare of cropland, Cuba or Tonga?
- Cuba, at 0.59 against 0.4 in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate application per hectare of cropland between Cuba and Tonga?
- 0.19, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Tonga rank globally for phosphate application per hectare of cropland?
- Cuba ranks 176th and Tonga ranks 179th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Phosphate application per hectare of cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.