Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services

Greece
93 %
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
33 %
in 2024
Greece rank
26th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
24th

Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services over time

  • Greece
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
20406080100200020122024

How they compare

Greece currently reports 93 % against 33 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 60 %.

That makes Greece's figure about 2.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Greece ranks 26th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 134 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 80.7 % 25.2 % 55.5 % Greece
2010s 86.9 % 28.6 % 58.3 % Greece
2020s 91.6 % 31.8 % 59.8 % Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services, Greece or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Greece, at 93 % against 33 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services between Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
60 %, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Greece and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services?
Greece ranks 26th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-sanitation-services-percent-value/greece/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-sanitation-services-percent-value/greece/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Greece vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
174 places, 4,285 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.