Georgia vs India: Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services
Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services over time
- Georgia
- India
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 63 % against 63 % in India, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 62nd and India ranks 62nd of 134 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and India in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.3 % | 18.5 % | 6.8 % | Georgia |
| 2010s | 27.2 % | 41.3 % | 14.1 % | India |
| 2020s | 59.8 % | 58.6 % | 1.2 % | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services, Georgia or India?
- Georgia, at 63 % against 63 % in India as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services between Georgia and India?
- 0 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and India?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and India rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services?
- Georgia ranks 62nd and India ranks 62nd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed sanitation services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.