Sierra Leone vs South Africa: Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled)

Sierra Leone
25.2 %
in 2024
South Africa
24.4 %
in 2024
Sierra Leone rank
33rd
South Africa rank
36th

Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled) over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • South Africa
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 25.2 % against 24.4 % in South Africa, a difference of 0.8 %.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.

Sierra Leone ranks 33rd and South Africa ranks 36th of 147 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 37.91 % 25.74 % 12.17 % Sierra Leone
2010s 31.3 % 22.32 % 8.98 % Sierra Leone
2020s 25.58 % 23.44 % 2.14 % Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled), Sierra Leone or South Africa?
Sierra Leone, at 25.2 % against 24.4 % in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled) between Sierra Leone and South Africa?
0.8 %, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and South Africa?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Sierra Leone and South Africa rank globally for percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled)?
Sierra Leone ranks 33rd and South Africa ranks 36th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled estimates) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs South Africa: Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-children-under-5-years-of-age-who-are-stunted-modelled-estimates-percent/sierra-leone/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-children-under-5-years-of-age-who-are-stunted-modelled-estimates-percent/sierra-leone/south-africa/">Sierra Leone vs South Africa: Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled estimates) (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 5,075 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.