Gabon vs Panama: Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled)
Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled) over time
- Gabon
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 14 % against 13.7 % in Gabon, a difference of 0.3 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 66th and Panama ranks 64th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.34 % | 20.16 % | 3.18 % | Gabon |
| 2010s | 16.31 % | 18.5 % | 2.19 % | Panama |
| 2020s | 13.88 % | 14.1 % | 0.22 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled), Gabon or Panama?
- Panama, at 14 % against 13.7 % in Gabon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled) between Gabon and Panama?
- 0.3 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Panama?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and Panama rank globally for percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled)?
- Gabon ranks 66th and Panama ranks 64th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of children under 5 years of age who are stunted (modelled estimates) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.