Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Per capita meat consumption in the United States

Sao Tome and Principe
17.68 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Switzerland
17.52 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
116th
Switzerland rank
118th

Per capita meat consumption in the United States over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Switzerland
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 17.68 kilograms per year per capita against 17.52 kilograms per year per capita in Switzerland, a difference of 0.16 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 192 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6337 kilograms per year per capita 5.62 kilograms per year per capita 4.99 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
1970s 0.9626 kilograms per year per capita 7.05 kilograms per year per capita 6.09 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
1980s 1.67 kilograms per year per capita 9.36 kilograms per year per capita 7.69 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
1990s 2.97 kilograms per year per capita 11.58 kilograms per year per capita 8.61 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
2000s 6.86 kilograms per year per capita 14.22 kilograms per year per capita 7.36 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
2010s 10.58 kilograms per year per capita 16.22 kilograms per year per capita 5.64 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland
2020s 16.46 kilograms per year per capita 17.5 kilograms per year per capita 1.04 kilograms per year per capita Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption in the united states, Sao Tome and Principe or Switzerland?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 17.68 kilograms per year per capita against 17.52 kilograms per year per capita in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption in the united states between Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
0.16 kilograms per year per capita, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland rank globally for per capita meat consumption in the united states?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/sao-tome-and-principe/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/sao-tome-and-principe/switzerland/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Per capita meat consumption in the United States</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption in the United States
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.