Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Per capita meat consumption in the United States

Panama
50.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
49.48 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Panama rank
21st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
22nd

Per capita meat consumption in the United States over time

  • Panama
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 50.01 kilograms per year per capita against 49.48 kilograms per year per capita in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.53 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Panama ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 3.62 kilograms per year per capita 12.37 kilograms per year per capita 8.75 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 5.48 kilograms per year per capita 18.01 kilograms per year per capita 12.53 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 10.64 kilograms per year per capita 22.04 kilograms per year per capita 11.4 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 18.48 kilograms per year per capita 22.5 kilograms per year per capita 4.02 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 28.5 kilograms per year per capita 38.11 kilograms per year per capita 9.61 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 36.26 kilograms per year per capita 58.96 kilograms per year per capita 22.71 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 49.85 kilograms per year per capita 46.55 kilograms per year per capita 3.3 kilograms per year per capita Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption in the united states, Panama or Trinidad and Tobago?
Panama, at 50.01 kilograms per year per capita against 49.48 kilograms per year per capita in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption in the united states between Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.53 kilograms per year per capita, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for per capita meat consumption in the united states?
Panama ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/panama/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/panama/trinidad-and-tobago/">Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Per capita meat consumption in the United States</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption in the United States
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.