Argentina vs United Arab Emirates: Per capita meat consumption in the United States

Argentina
46.73 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
46.44 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Argentina rank
30th
United Arab Emirates rank
31st

Per capita meat consumption in the United States over time

  • Argentina
  • United Arab Emirates
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 46.73 kilograms per year per capita against 46.44 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.29 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 4.47 kilograms per year per capita 0.5585 kilograms per year per capita 3.91 kilograms per year per capita Argentina
1970s 9.45 kilograms per year per capita 19.37 kilograms per year per capita 9.92 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1980s 12.07 kilograms per year per capita 36.07 kilograms per year per capita 24 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1990s 21.02 kilograms per year per capita 37.64 kilograms per year per capita 16.62 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2000s 25.76 kilograms per year per capita 43.43 kilograms per year per capita 17.67 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2010s 40.74 kilograms per year per capita 28.36 kilograms per year per capita 12.38 kilograms per year per capita Argentina
2020s 47.39 kilograms per year per capita 49.11 kilograms per year per capita 1.72 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption in the united states, Argentina or United Arab Emirates?
Argentina, at 46.73 kilograms per year per capita against 46.44 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption in the united states between Argentina and United Arab Emirates?
0.29 kilograms per year per capita, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and United Arab Emirates rank globally for per capita meat consumption in the united states?
Argentina ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs United Arab Emirates: Per capita meat consumption in the United States. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/argentina/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-usa/argentina/united-arab-emirates/">Argentina vs United Arab Emirates: Per capita meat consumption in the United States</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption in the United States
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.