Libya vs Poland: Per capita meat and fish consumption
Libya
31.28 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Poland
30.95 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya rank
64th
Poland rank
65th
Per capita meat and fish consumption over time
- Libya
- Poland
How they compare
Libya currently reports 31.28 kilograms per year per capita against 30.95 kilograms per year per capita in Poland, a difference of 0.33 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Poland ahead.
Libya ranks 64th and Poland ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.78 kilograms per year per capita | 29.65 kilograms per year per capita | 2.87 kilograms per year per capita | Poland |
| 2020s | 32.98 kilograms per year per capita | 31.81 kilograms per year per capita | 1.17 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat and fish consumption, Libya or Poland?
- Libya, at 31.28 kilograms per year per capita against 30.95 kilograms per year per capita in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat and fish consumption between Libya and Poland?
- 0.33 kilograms per year per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Poland rank globally for per capita meat and fish consumption?
- Libya ranks 64th and Poland ranks 65th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.