Chile vs Suriname: Per capita meat type

Chile
37.86
in 2023
Suriname
36.64
in 2023
Chile rank
47th
Suriname rank
50th

Per capita meat type over time

  • Chile
  • Suriname
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 37.86 against 36.64 in Suriname, a difference of 1.22.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Chile ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 50th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 3.54 12.96 9.42 Suriname
1970s 5.25 16.48 11.23 Suriname
1980s 8.05 24.39 16.34 Suriname
1990s 18.25 22.97 4.72 Suriname
2000s 29.76 28.53 1.22 Chile
2010s 37.06 36.25 0.8165 Chile
2020s 37.67 44.34 6.67 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat type, Chile or Suriname?
Chile, at 37.86 against 36.64 in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat type between Chile and Suriname?
1.22, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for per capita meat type?
Chile ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat type
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed