Antigua and Barbuda vs Netherlands Antilles: Per capita meat and fish consumption

Antigua and Barbuda
67.79 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Netherlands Antilles
63.98 kilograms per year per capita
in 2009
Antigua and Barbuda rank
7th
Netherlands Antilles rank
10th

Per capita meat and fish consumption over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Netherlands Antilles
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 67.79 kilograms per year per capita against 63.98 kilograms per year per capita in Netherlands Antilles, a difference of 3.81 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands Antilles's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands Antilles ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 7th and Netherlands Antilles ranks 10th of 192 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands Antilles in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Netherlands Antilles Difference Ahead
1960s 7.19 kilograms per year per capita 11.84 kilograms per year per capita 4.65 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
1970s 9.9 kilograms per year per capita 21.82 kilograms per year per capita 11.93 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
1980s 40.13 kilograms per year per capita 27.62 kilograms per year per capita 12.51 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 55.82 kilograms per year per capita 38.29 kilograms per year per capita 17.53 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 53.58 kilograms per year per capita 62.29 kilograms per year per capita 8.71 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat and fish consumption, Antigua and Barbuda or Netherlands Antilles?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 67.79 kilograms per year per capita against 63.98 kilograms per year per capita in Netherlands Antilles as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat and fish consumption between Antigua and Barbuda and Netherlands Antilles?
3.81 kilograms per year per capita, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Netherlands Antilles?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Netherlands Antilles rank globally for per capita meat and fish consumption?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 7th and Netherlands Antilles ranks 10th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Netherlands Antilles: Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-type/antigua-and-barbuda/netherlands-antilles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-type/antigua-and-barbuda/netherlands-antilles/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Netherlands Antilles: Per capita meat and fish consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat and fish consumption
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.