Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Per capita meat consumption by type

Sweden
0.33 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.39 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sweden rank
111th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
109th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Sweden
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
01234196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.39 kilograms per year per capita against 0.33 kilograms per year per capita in Sweden, a difference of 0.06 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 111th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 109th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 2.76 kilograms per year per capita 0.5176 kilograms per year per capita 2.24 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1970s 2.12 kilograms per year per capita 0.4672 kilograms per year per capita 1.66 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1980s 3.18 kilograms per year per capita 0.474 kilograms per year per capita 2.71 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1990s 2.74 kilograms per year per capita 0.4328 kilograms per year per capita 2.31 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2000s 2.21 kilograms per year per capita 0.4259 kilograms per year per capita 1.79 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2010s 1.48 kilograms per year per capita 0.452 kilograms per year per capita 1.02 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2020s 0.205 kilograms per year per capita 0.4025 kilograms per year per capita 0.1975 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Sweden or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.39 kilograms per year per capita against 0.33 kilograms per year per capita in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Sweden ranks 111th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 109th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/sweden/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/sweden/tanzania/">Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.