Suriname vs Syria: Per capita meat consumption by type
Suriname
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Syria
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Suriname rank
161st
Syria rank
160th
Per capita meat consumption by type over time
- Suriname
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Suriname, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Syria ahead.
Suriname ranks 161st and Syria ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.163 kilograms per year per capita | 0.132 kilograms per year per capita | 0.031 kilograms per year per capita | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.0875 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0675 kilograms per year per capita | 0.02 kilograms per year per capita | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Suriname or Syria?
- Syria, at 0.03 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Suriname and Syria?
- 0 kilograms per year per capita, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Syria rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
- Suriname ranks 161st and Syria ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.