Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Per capita meat consumption by type

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
178th
Saint Lucia rank
178th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th and Saint Lucia ranks 178th of 191 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.17 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 2.17 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 2.72 kilograms per year per capita 0.0089 kilograms per year per capita 2.72 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 2.45 kilograms per year per capita 1.3 kilograms per year per capita 1.15 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 4.64 kilograms per year per capita 1.32 kilograms per year per capita 3.32 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 6.35 kilograms per year per capita 0.0505 kilograms per year per capita 6.3 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 3.58 kilograms per year per capita 0.132 kilograms per year per capita 3.44 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.08 kilograms per year per capita 0.015 kilograms per year per capita 0.065 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Saint Lucia?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
0 kilograms per year per capita, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th and Saint Lucia ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.