Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type

Samoa
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa rank
177th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
178th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Samoa
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Samoa ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kilograms per year per capita 2.17 kilograms per year per capita 2.17 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 2.61 kilograms per year per capita 2.72 kilograms per year per capita 0.1184 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 3.11 kilograms per year per capita 2.45 kilograms per year per capita 0.6561 kilograms per year per capita Samoa
1990s 0.756 kilograms per year per capita 4.64 kilograms per year per capita 3.88 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0636 kilograms per year per capita 6.35 kilograms per year per capita 6.29 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.113 kilograms per year per capita 3.58 kilograms per year per capita 3.46 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.005 kilograms per year per capita 0.08 kilograms per year per capita 0.075 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Samoa or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Samoa, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Samoa ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/samoa/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/samoa/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.