Malawi vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type

Malawi
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Malawi rank
178th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
178th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Malawi
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02468196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 kilograms per year per capita.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 178th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th of 191 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 kilograms per year per capita 2.17 kilograms per year per capita 2.17 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0069 kilograms per year per capita 2.72 kilograms per year per capita 2.72 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 kilograms per year per capita 2.45 kilograms per year per capita 2.45 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0019 kilograms per year per capita 4.64 kilograms per year per capita 4.64 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0 kilograms per year per capita 6.35 kilograms per year per capita 6.35 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0 kilograms per year per capita 3.58 kilograms per year per capita 3.58 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.08 kilograms per year per capita 0.08 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Malawi or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Malawi, at 0 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Malawi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kilograms per year per capita, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Malawi ranks 178th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/malawi/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/malawi/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Malawi vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.