Ecuador vs Naoero: Per capita meat consumption by type
Ecuador
0.58 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Naoero
0.5591 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Ecuador rank
87th
Naoero rank
90th
Per capita meat consumption by type over time
- Ecuador
- Naoero
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.58 kilograms per year per capita against 0.5591 kilograms per year per capita in Naoero, a difference of 0.0209 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Naoero ahead.
Ecuador ranks 87th and Naoero ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.58 kilograms per year per capita | 3.01 kilograms per year per capita | 2.43 kilograms per year per capita | Naoero |
| 2020s | 0.58 kilograms per year per capita | 2.5 kilograms per year per capita | 1.92 kilograms per year per capita | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Ecuador or Naoero?
- Ecuador, at 0.58 kilograms per year per capita against 0.5591 kilograms per year per capita in Naoero as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Ecuador and Naoero?
- 0.0209 kilograms per year per capita, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Naoero?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Naoero rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
- Ecuador ranks 87th and Naoero ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.