Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Per capita meat consumption by type

Dominican Republic
0.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Eswatini
0.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
159th
Eswatini rank
157th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Eswatini
0123196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.04 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 159th and Eswatini ranks 157th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0238 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0238 kilograms per year per capita Dominican Republic
1970s 0.0286 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0286 kilograms per year per capita Dominican Republic
1980s 0.0792 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0792 kilograms per year per capita Dominican Republic
1990s 0.0425 kilograms per year per capita 0.6228 kilograms per year per capita 0.5803 kilograms per year per capita Eswatini
2000s 0.0192 kilograms per year per capita 0.4331 kilograms per year per capita 0.4139 kilograms per year per capita Eswatini
2010s 0.027 kilograms per year per capita 0.248 kilograms per year per capita 0.221 kilograms per year per capita Eswatini
2020s 0.0325 kilograms per year per capita 0.3375 kilograms per year per capita 0.305 kilograms per year per capita Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Dominican Republic or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.04 kilograms per year per capita against 0.03 kilograms per year per capita in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Eswatini rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Dominican Republic ranks 159th and Eswatini ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/dominican-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/dominican-republic/eswatini/">Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.