Comoros vs Samoa: Per capita meat consumption by type
Comoros
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
178th
Samoa rank
177th
Per capita meat consumption by type over time
- Comoros
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Samoa ahead.
Comoros ranks 178th and Samoa ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.017 kilograms per year per capita | 0.113 kilograms per year per capita | 0.096 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.6 kilograms per year per capita | 0.005 kilograms per year per capita | 0.595 kilograms per year per capita | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Comoros or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Comoros and Samoa?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Samoa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Samoa rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
- Comoros ranks 178th and Samoa ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.