Chad vs Libya: Per capita meat consumption by type
Chad
0.8067 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Libya
0.8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Chad rank
69th
Libya rank
71st
Per capita meat consumption by type over time
- Chad
- Libya
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.8067 kilograms per year per capita against 0.8 kilograms per year per capita in Libya, a difference of 0.0067 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Chad ranks 69th and Libya ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7407 kilograms per year per capita | 0.844 kilograms per year per capita | 0.1033 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.8061 kilograms per year per capita | 0.73 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0761 kilograms per year per capita | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Chad or Libya?
- Chad, at 0.8067 kilograms per year per capita against 0.8 kilograms per year per capita in Libya as of 2022.
- What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Chad and Libya?
- 0.0067 kilograms per year per capita, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Libya?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Chad and Libya rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
- Chad ranks 69th and Libya ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.