Central African Republic vs Congo: Per capita meat consumption by type

Central African Republic
6.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2022
Congo
7.74 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
9th
Congo rank
8th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
02468196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 7.74 kilograms per year per capita against 6.94 kilograms per year per capita in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.8 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 9th and Congo ranks 8th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 5.92 kilograms per year per capita 6.33 kilograms per year per capita 0.4102 kilograms per year per capita Congo
1970s 5.12 kilograms per year per capita 5.49 kilograms per year per capita 0.368 kilograms per year per capita Congo
1980s 6.23 kilograms per year per capita 5.21 kilograms per year per capita 1.02 kilograms per year per capita Central African Republic
1990s 6.16 kilograms per year per capita 4.67 kilograms per year per capita 1.49 kilograms per year per capita Central African Republic
2000s 5.73 kilograms per year per capita 6.15 kilograms per year per capita 0.4201 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2010s 6.99 kilograms per year per capita 8.44 kilograms per year per capita 1.45 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2020s 6.87 kilograms per year per capita 7.98 kilograms per year per capita 1.1 kilograms per year per capita Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Central African Republic or Congo?
Congo, at 7.74 kilograms per year per capita against 6.94 kilograms per year per capita in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Central African Republic and Congo?
0.8 kilograms per year per capita, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Central African Republic ranks 9th and Congo ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Congo: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/central-african-republic/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/central-african-republic/congo-rep/">Central African Republic vs Congo: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.