Belize vs Comoros: Per capita meat consumption by type
Belize
0.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros
0 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Belize rank
175th
Comoros rank
178th
Per capita meat consumption by type over time
- Belize
- Comoros
How they compare
Belize currently reports 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 175th and Comoros ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.282 kilograms per year per capita | 0.017 kilograms per year per capita | 0.265 kilograms per year per capita | Belize |
| 2020s | 0.1 kilograms per year per capita | 0.6 kilograms per year per capita | 0.5 kilograms per year per capita | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Belize or Comoros?
- Belize, at 0.01 kilograms per year per capita against 0 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Belize and Comoros?
- 0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Comoros?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Comoros rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
- Belize ranks 175th and Comoros ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.