Albania vs Antigua and Barbuda: Per capita meat consumption by type

Albania
0.08 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda
0.09 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Albania rank
149th
Antigua and Barbuda rank
148th

Per capita meat consumption by type over time

  • Albania
  • Antigua and Barbuda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.09 kilograms per year per capita against 0.08 kilograms per year per capita in Albania, a difference of 0.01 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Albania ranks 149th and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Antigua and Barbuda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Antigua and Barbuda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.9655 kilograms per year per capita 0.9655 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0 kilograms per year per capita 1.18 kilograms per year per capita 1.18 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.0097 kilograms per year per capita 0.0097 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.1127 kilograms per year per capita 0 kilograms per year per capita 0.1127 kilograms per year per capita Albania
2000s 0.0606 kilograms per year per capita 1.73 kilograms per year per capita 1.66 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.123 kilograms per year per capita 0.3769 kilograms per year per capita 0.2539 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.1175 kilograms per year per capita 0.27 kilograms per year per capita 0.1525 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat consumption by type, Albania or Antigua and Barbuda?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.09 kilograms per year per capita against 0.08 kilograms per year per capita in Albania as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat consumption by type between Albania and Antigua and Barbuda?
0.01 kilograms per year per capita, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Antigua and Barbuda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Albania and Antigua and Barbuda rank globally for per capita meat consumption by type?
Albania ranks 149th and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Antigua and Barbuda: Per capita meat consumption by type. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/albania/antigua-and-barbuda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-consumption-by-type-kilograms-per-year/albania/antigua-and-barbuda/">Albania vs Antigua and Barbuda: Per capita meat consumption by type</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat consumption by type
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,208 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.