Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Panama: Pelagic Fish β€” Production

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
3 1000 t
in 2023
Panama
224 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
30th
Panama rank
33rd

Pelagic Fish β€” Production over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Panama
050100150200201020162023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 224 1000 t against 3 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 221 1000 t.

That makes Panama's figure about 74.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 30th and Panama ranks 33rd of 31 groups.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Panama Difference Ahead
2010s 1.4 1000 t 162.5 1000 t 161.1 1000 t Panama
2020s 2.75 1000 t 224 1000 t 221.25 1000 t Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pelagic fish β€” production, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Panama?
Panama, at 224 1000 t against 3 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in pelagic fish β€” production between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Panama?
221 1000 t, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Panama?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Panama rank globally for pelagic fish β€” production?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 30th and Panama ranks 33rd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish β€” Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Panama: Pelagic Fish β€” Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pelagic-fish-production/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pelagic-fish-production/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/panama/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Panama: Pelagic Fish β€” Production</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pelagic Fish β€” Production
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 2,421 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.