Qatar vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pelagic Fish — Food
Pelagic Fish — Food over time
- Qatar
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 18 1000 t against 18 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 1000 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 110th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 110th of 194 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18 1000 t | 18 1000 t | 0 1000 t | — |
| 2020s | 18 1000 t | 18 1000 t | 0 1000 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pelagic fish — food, Qatar or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Qatar, at 18 1000 t against 18 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pelagic fish — food between Qatar and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0 1000 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Qatar and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for pelagic fish — food?
- Qatar ranks 110th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 110th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish — Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.