Guinea vs Zambia: Pelagic Fish — Food supply
Pelagic Fish — Food supply over time
- Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 67,029 million Kcal against 64,177 million Kcal in Zambia, a difference of 2,852 million Kcal.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 59th and Zambia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 60,172 million Kcal | 32,290 million Kcal | 27,882 million Kcal | Guinea |
| 2020s | 66,108 million Kcal | 61,140 million Kcal | 4,968 million Kcal | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pelagic fish — food supply, Guinea or Zambia?
- Guinea, at 67,029 million Kcal against 64,177 million Kcal in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pelagic fish — food supply between Guinea and Zambia?
- 2,852 million Kcal, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Zambia rank globally for pelagic fish — food supply?
- Guinea ranks 59th and Zambia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.