Czechia vs Eastern Africa: Pelagic Fish — Feed
Pelagic Fish — Feed over time
- Czechia
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 66 1000 t against 62 1000 t in Czechia, a difference of 4 1000 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 20th and Eastern Africa ranks 23rd of 141 countries.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.1 1000 t | 58.6 1000 t | 32.5 1000 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 59 1000 t | 62.5 1000 t | 3.5 1000 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pelagic fish — feed, Czechia or Eastern Africa?
- Eastern Africa, at 66 1000 t against 62 1000 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pelagic fish — feed between Czechia and Eastern Africa?
- 4 1000 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eastern Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Eastern Africa rank globally for pelagic fish — feed?
- Czechia ranks 20th and Eastern Africa ranks 23rd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.