Belarus vs Georgia: Pelagic Fish — Export quantity
Pelagic Fish — Export quantity over time
- Belarus
- Georgia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 66 1000 t against 60 1000 t in Georgia, a difference of 6 1000 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Georgia ahead.
Belarus ranks 49th and Georgia ranks 52nd of 178 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.3 1000 t | 26.3 1000 t | 13 1000 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 66 1000 t | 64.75 1000 t | 1.25 1000 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pelagic fish — export quantity, Belarus or Georgia?
- Belarus, at 66 1000 t against 60 1000 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pelagic fish — export quantity between Belarus and Georgia?
- 6 1000 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for pelagic fish — export quantity?
- Belarus ranks 49th and Georgia ranks 52nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.