Australia and New Zealand vs Estonia: Pelagic Fish — Export quantity

Australia and New Zealand
67 1000 t
in 2023
Estonia
81 1000 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
44th
Estonia rank
42nd

Pelagic Fish — Export quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Estonia
020406080100201020162023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 81 1000 t against 67 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 14 1000 t.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Estonia ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 42nd of 160 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Estonia Difference Ahead
2010s 81.7 1000 t 75.9 1000 t 5.8 1000 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 67.5 1000 t 81 1000 t 13.5 1000 t Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pelagic fish — export quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Estonia?
Estonia, at 81 1000 t against 67 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in pelagic fish — export quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Estonia?
14 1000 t, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Estonia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Estonia rank globally for pelagic fish — export quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 42nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pelagic Fish — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Estonia: Pelagic Fish — Export quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pelagic-fish-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pelagic-fish-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/estonia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Estonia: Pelagic Fish — Export quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pelagic Fish — Export quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 2,754 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.