Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Palm kernels β€” Losses

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2 1000 t
in 2023
Melanesia
47 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
17th
Melanesia rank
15th

Palm kernels β€” Losses over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Melanesia
01020304050201020162023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 47 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 45 1000 t.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 23.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Melanesia ranks 15th of 17 groups.

Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Melanesia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4 1000 t 34.2 1000 t 33.8 1000 t Melanesia
2020s 2 1000 t 44.25 1000 t 42.25 1000 t Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palm kernels β€” losses, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at 47 1000 t against 2 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in palm kernels β€” losses between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
45 1000 t, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for palm kernels β€” losses?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Melanesia ranks 15th of 17 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palm kernels β€” Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Palm kernels β€” Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-losses-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-losses-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Palm kernels β€” Losses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm kernels β€” Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
58 places, 772 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.