United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Palm kernels — Export Quantity

United Republic of Tanzania
0 t
in 2013
Zimbabwe
0 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Palm kernels — Export Quantity over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 9 regions.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,360 t 0 t 1,360 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 462.7 t 0 t 462.7 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 103.1 t 0 t 103.1 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 103.1 t 0 t 103.1 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 231.2 t 6 t 225.2 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palm kernels — export quantity, United Republic of Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
What is the difference in palm kernels — export quantity between United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
0 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for palm kernels — export quantity?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 9 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palm kernels — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Palm kernels — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-export-quantity/united-republic-of-tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-export-quantity/united-republic-of-tanzania/zimbabwe/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Palm kernels — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm kernels — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
125 places, 6,305 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.