Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Other vegetables, fresh: Gross Production … square kilometre US

Bangladesh
1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Other vegetables, fresh: Gross Production … square kilometre US over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Zimbabwe
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.33 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 115 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3419 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2521 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 0.3481 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3425 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 0.3819 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3952 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0133 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.4485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4029 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0455 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8838 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2186 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9714 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3588 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — gross production value (constant), Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
Bangladesh, at 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — gross production value (constant) between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
0.33 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — gross production value (constant)?
Bangladesh ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-vegetables-fresh-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/bangladesh/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-vegetables-fresh-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/bangladesh/zimbabwe/">Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
116 places, 6,376 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.