Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Pakistan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
96th
Pakistan rank
94th
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 94th of 165 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Kazakhstan and Pakistan rank globally for other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 94th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.