Ireland vs Luxembourg: Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Ireland
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Luxembourg
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ireland rank
159th
Luxembourg rank
159th
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Ireland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Ireland or Luxembourg?
- Ireland, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ireland and Luxembourg rank globally for other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Ireland ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 159th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.