Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
55th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Latvia ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 105 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.