Jordan vs Libya: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP
Jordan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Libya
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 1992
Jordan rank
101st
Libya rank
101st
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Jordan
- Libya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Libya ahead.
Jordan ranks 101st and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp, Jordan or Libya?
- Jordan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2009.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp between Jordan and Libya?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 1992.
- How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.