Japan vs Libya: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP
Japan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 1997
Libya
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 1992
Japan rank
100th
Libya rank
101st
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Japan
- Libya
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Japan ranks 100th and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Japan |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp, Japan or Libya?
- Japan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 1997.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp between Japan and Libya?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Japan and Libya rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- Japan ranks 100th and Libya ranks 101st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.