China vs Serbia: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP
China
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
81st
Serbia rank
78th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times China's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 105 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp, China or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp between China and Serbia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.