Sudan vs Zambia: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre
Sudan
0.0506 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0422 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan rank
52nd
Zambia rank
54th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0506 t per square kilometre against 0.0422 t per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0084 t per square kilometre.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 52nd and Zambia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0477 t per square kilometre | 0.0413 t per square kilometre | 0.0064 t per square kilometre | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0501 t per square kilometre | 0.0416 t per square kilometre | 0.0085 t per square kilometre | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre, Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 0.0506 t per square kilometre against 0.0422 t per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre between Sudan and Zambia?
- 0.0084 t per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre?
- Sudan ranks 52nd and Zambia ranks 54th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.