Jordan vs Mexico: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre
Jordan
0 t per square kilometre
in 2009
Mexico
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
100th
Mexico rank
97th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Jordan
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 100th and Mexico ranks 97th of 105 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre, Jordan or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre between Jordan and Mexico?
- 0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mexico?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Jordan and Mexico rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre?
- Jordan ranks 100th and Mexico ranks 97th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.