Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0138 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0131 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
74th

Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0138 t per square kilometre against 0.0131 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0007 t per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 105 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0216 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.0199 t per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0.0282 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre 0.025 t per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0273 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0215 t per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.0074 t per square kilometre 0.0046 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0089 t per square kilometre 0.0057 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0083 t per square kilometre 0.0123 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0411 t per square kilometre 0.0131 t per square kilometre 0.028 t per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 0.0138 t per square kilometre against 0.0131 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
0.0007 t per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
106 places, 5,234 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.