Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita
Luxembourg
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
60th
Pakistan rank
57th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0005 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pakistan ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 106 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita, Luxembourg or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0005 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita between Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Pakistan rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.