Jordan vs Panama: Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita
Jordan
0 t per person
in 2009
Panama
0 t per person
in 2021
Jordan rank
102nd
Panama rank
102nd
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Panama
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Panama, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Jordan ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 102nd of 106 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | — |
| 1970s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Panama |
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita, Jordan or Panama?
- Jordan, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Panama as of 2009.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita between Jordan and Panama?
- 0 t per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Panama?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
- How do Jordan and Panama rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — production, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 102nd of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.