Romania vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Romania
0.016 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.015 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
74th

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Romania
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.016 ha per square kilometre against 0.015 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.001 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 104 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0175 ha per square kilometre 0.0033 ha per square kilometre 0.0141 ha per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0072 ha per square kilometre 0.0064 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 ha per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0396 ha per square kilometre 0.0112 ha per square kilometre 0.0284 ha per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0041 ha per square kilometre 0.0131 ha per square kilometre 0.009 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0015 ha per square kilometre 0.0143 ha per square kilometre 0.0128 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0052 ha per square kilometre 0.0146 ha per square kilometre 0.0094 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0089 ha per square kilometre 0.015 ha per square kilometre 0.0061 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre, Romania or Zimbabwe?
Romania, at 0.016 ha per square kilometre against 0.015 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre between Romania and Zimbabwe?
0.001 ha per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Romania ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/romania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/romania/zimbabwe/">Romania vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
105 places, 5,203 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.