Israel vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Israel
0.0081 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.015 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
76th
Zimbabwe rank
74th

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.015 ha per square kilometre against 0.0081 ha per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0069 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 104 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0983 ha per square kilometre 0.0033 ha per square kilometre 0.095 ha per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.0932 ha per square kilometre 0.0064 ha per square kilometre 0.0868 ha per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.0685 ha per square kilometre 0.0112 ha per square kilometre 0.0573 ha per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.007 ha per square kilometre 0.0131 ha per square kilometre 0.0061 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0058 ha per square kilometre 0.0143 ha per square kilometre 0.0085 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0078 ha per square kilometre 0.0146 ha per square kilometre 0.0068 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0081 ha per square kilometre 0.015 ha per square kilometre 0.007 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre, Israel or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.015 ha per square kilometre against 0.0081 ha per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre between Israel and Zimbabwe?
0.0069 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Zimbabwe rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/israel/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/israel/zimbabwe/">Israel vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
105 places, 5,203 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.