Botswana vs Mauritania: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0385 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0323 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
54th
Mauritania rank
57th

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritania
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0385 ha per square kilometre against 0.0323 ha per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0062 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 54th and Mauritania ranks 57th of 104 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0359 ha per square kilometre 0.0209 ha per square kilometre 0.015 ha per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0.0476 ha per square kilometre 0.0235 ha per square kilometre 0.0242 ha per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0531 ha per square kilometre 0.0359 ha per square kilometre 0.0172 ha per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0173 ha per square kilometre 0.0397 ha per square kilometre 0.0224 ha per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.0176 ha per square kilometre 0.0429 ha per square kilometre 0.0253 ha per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.0348 ha per square kilometre 0.0398 ha per square kilometre 0.0049 ha per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0729 ha per square kilometre 0.0323 ha per square kilometre 0.0406 ha per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre, Botswana or Mauritania?
Botswana, at 0.0385 ha per square kilometre against 0.0323 ha per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre between Botswana and Mauritania?
0.0062 ha per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mauritania rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 54th and Mauritania ranks 57th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritania: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/">Botswana vs Mauritania: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
105 places, 5,203 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.