Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0313 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0335 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
59th
Guatemala rank
56th

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guatemala
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0335 ha per square kilometre against 0.0313 ha per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0022 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 59th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 104 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guatemala Difference Ahead
1980s 0.059 ha per square kilometre 0.0233 ha per square kilometre 0.0357 ha per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 0.0695 ha per square kilometre 0.0278 ha per square kilometre 0.0417 ha per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 0.0682 ha per square kilometre 0.0315 ha per square kilometre 0.0367 ha per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 0.1271 ha per square kilometre 0.0338 ha per square kilometre 0.0933 ha per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 0.0306 ha per square kilometre 0.0336 ha per square kilometre 0.003 ha per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0335 ha per square kilometre against 0.0313 ha per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Guatemala?
0.0022 ha per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guatemala?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Guatemala rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 59th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-pulses-n-e-c-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/">Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
105 places, 5,203 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.