South Sudan vs Tunisia: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
South Sudan
0.0031 ha per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0027 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan rank
21st
Tunisia rank
24th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0031 ha per person against 0.0027 ha per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0004 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 21st and Tunisia ranks 24th of 105 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0033 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0033 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, South Sudan or Tunisia?
- South Sudan, at 0.0031 ha per person against 0.0027 ha per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 0.0004 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 21st and Tunisia ranks 24th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.