New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita
New Caledonia
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
57th
Zimbabwe rank
59th
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita over time
- New Caledonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 105 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
- New Caledonia, at 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 ha per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for other pulses n.e.c. — area harvested, per capita?
- New Caledonia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other pulses n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.